Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales (2017)
IMDB Rating : 7.2/10 (as on 31.05.2017)
Captain Jack Sparrow
finds the winds of ill-fortune blowing even more strongly when deadly ghost
pirates led by his old nemesis, the terrifying Captain Salazar, escape from the
Devil's Triangle, determined to kill every pirate at sea...including him. Captain
Jack's only hope of survival lies in seeking out the legendary Trident of
Poseidon, a powerful artifact that bestows upon its possessor total control
over the seas.
Directors: Joachim
Rønning, Espen Sandberg
Writers: Jeff Nathanson
(screenplay), Jeff Nathanson (story by)
Stars: Johnny Depp,
Geoffrey Rush, Javier Bardem
IMDB link Here
Pirates of the Caribbean 5 Is a Sinking Vessel
CHRISTOPHER ORR
The subtitle of the new Pirates
of the Caribbean movie is “Dead Men Tell No Tales.” The moral of the movie,
alas, is that the same cannot be said of dead franchises.
The first Pirates film was an
unexpected success: wildly overlong and over-plotted yet kept afloat by a
wicked, bravura, and utterly original performance by Johnny Depp as Captain
Jack Sparrow, a swishily swaggering mélange of rum, eyeliner, and impudence. As
is customary, the sequel was a pale imitation, and the third installment of the
presumed trilogy went a bit trippy and meta.
Which would all have been well
and good enough. But money makes people do silly things. The half-hearted and
wildly unnecessary fourth movie, Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides
was one such thing. It will surprise no one to learn that the latest
installment in the franchise is another. At least On Stranger Tides had the
decency to be a standalone movie; with Dead Men Tell No Tales, there is talk of
that most pernicious of cinematic gambits, the “soft reboot.”
There’s a small role for Bloom,
whose current career seems to consist largely of retconning characters
(Legolas, Will Turner) from the period when some mistakenly thought he was a
plausible leading man, into projects (The Hobbit, this latest Pirates entry)
released at a point when we all know he’s not. There’s even a
blink-and-you’ll-miss-it glimpse of Knightley, who clearly has better things to
do than waste time in this franchise. In place of a previous cameo by Keith
Richards, who was a principal inspiration for Jack Sparrow, we have a cameo by
Paul McCartney, who was not.
As with the roles, so too with
the plot. Per the norm, there is a mystic artifact to be acquired, the Trident
of Poseidon, which has the power to break all of the sea-curses accumulated
over the previous four films. (How’s that for a reboot?) There are plots and
betrayals, piratical zombies and sea monsters and a ghost ship, and much
bouncing around from vessel to vessel.
Even when the movie introduces
new elements to the franchise, they are the stalest chestnuts in the cupboard.
Jack Sparrow is given an entirely gratuitous origin story, so that he can be cinematically
de-aged à la Robert Downey Jr. in Captain America: Civil War or Kurt Russell in
Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2. In fact, if you genuinely desire subplots about
paternities revealed or a noble sacrifice by a secondary character in the final
reel, go see (or re-see) Guardians 2, which does both better.
Depp slurs and sways his way
through the film as usual, but reports of his erratic behavior on set cast the
performance in a somewhat different light this time around. When, at one point,
he introduces himself with boozy extravagance as “the great Captain Jack
Sparrow,” his audience’s palpable disappointment feels as though it accrues as
much to Depp himself as to the character he is playing. Meanwhile, newcomers
Thwaites and Scodelario possess a small fraction of the shimmer supplied by
Bloom and Knightley before them.
It all adds up to a dreary,
dispiriting voyage. During the finale, as Bardem’s Salazar makes a final,
mortal approach, he bellows, “This is where the tale ends!” Please, please,
please, let it be so.
Read full review at Atlantic
A Fitting Finale To Johnny Depp's Defining Franchise
Scott Mendelson
This has been pitched as
"the final adventure," and no one is expecting a redux of the prior
sequels' blowout box office. As such, the only thing at stake is Johnny Depp's
star power, the money that Disney spent on this picture ($230 million plus
marketing) and the viability of the Mouse House's Memorial Day launches
No, the world didn't need a
fifth Pirates of the Caribbean movie. Dead Men Tell No Tales doesn't quite
measure up to the gloriously gonzo original trilogy. But it still makes its
mark as a grounded adventure, or as grounded as a supernatural pirate movie can
be. If this is the start of a new series, it is a step in the right direction.
If it indeed acts as a series finale as promised, then the franchise can exit
stage left with honor. Best of all, this fifth offering allows viewers to
forget that On Stranger Tides ever happened.
To the extent we even needed a
second film after the shockingly good Gore Verbinski original, I will defend
Verbinski’s trilogy's kitchen sink excess until the end. The filmmaker's
seemingly jovial pirate adventure gave way to a grim and piercing piece of
post-9/11 criticism, with the seemingly good British army using the threat of
piracy to abuse power to such an extent that they became villains who murdered
whistleblower politicians and hanged children. It wasn’t quite the carefree
escapism that audiences wanted but, like the (also underrated) Matrix sequels,
I admired the ambition and the refusal to give in to optimistic fantasy.
Jack Sparrow is still a
relative drag on the proceedings, as he’s been more “fly in the ointment” than
“useful rogue” at least since Dead Man’s Chest. Depp is fine, but the
character’s shtick is a lot less funny than it was 14 years ago when it was
something of a surprise to see a respected thespian hamming it up in an
otherwise straight-faced mega-budget action fantasy. Bardem chews exactly as
much scenery as you’d expect, while Thwaites and Scodelario make a charming
hero/heroine match. They don’t try to mimic Orlando Bloom and Keira Knightley,
and the movie is better for it.
There is a timely subtext about
an educated woman facing persecution and then having to manage stupid men whose
gender gives them authority and the presumption of competence. Aside from that,
and the emotional pull of tying up loose ends in the Pirates of the Caribbean
mythology, there isn’t much here beyond superficial pleasures. The pleasures
are genuine, and those merely seeking a full-throated pirate adventure with
good company will walk away satisfied. The film looks gorgeous, and the action
(save for the somewhat murky and chaotic finale) is well-staged and coherent.
Alas, I found the chases-to-swordplay ratios to be tilted in the wrong
direction.
Dead Men Tell No Tales is miles
better than On Stranger Tides, and those who wanted a more grounded and less
fantastical adventure may prefer it to Dead Man’s Chest and At World’s End. I
still adore those shoot for the moon blowouts, for their sheer chutzpah, for
their grim political commentary and for that time not so long ago when we could
never imagine a bigger and more obscenely overstuffed blockbuster than At
World’s End. The film, under two hours and relatively level-headed, ends on an
elegant and surprisingly moving note. If this is to be the end, it works as a
fitting finale.
Read full review at Forbes
Movie Rating ★★☆☆☆
Cap'n Jack's panto's back
Mike McCahill
Given the sorry fate of other
projects derived from Disney theme-park attractions – The Country Bears (2002),
The Haunted Mansion (2003) – it’s astonishing that the Pirates of the Caribbean
franchise should have remained financially seaworthy through four
passable-to-indifferent features. With Pirates 5 (subtitled Dead Men Tell No
Tales in the US, and Salazar’s Revenge in a number of other countries) the
cracks in the hull become unignorable.
Orlando Bloom has pleaded for
reduced participation, handing his sextant to on-screen offspring Brenton
Thwaites; Skins alumna Kaya Scodelario inherits Keira Knightley’s corsets. The
series, in other words, has entered its Muppet Babies or Scrappy-Doo phase,
with all the pop-cultural heft that implies.
There’s fresher blood behind
the camera, too, not entirely unwelcome after the avant garde tedium of Gore
Verbinski’s three-hour send-off At World’s End and Rob Marshall’s
by-the-numbers On Stranger Tides. Norwegians Joachim Rønning and Espen
Sandberg, fresh from the Oscar-nominated Kon-Tiki, are keener than their
predecessors to spend time at sea – some consolation to anybody wondering how
interested this series really is in pirating – and toss much of the ballast
that clogged previous instalments overboard. Dead Men Tell No Tales moves at a
faster rate of knots than any Pirates film; trouble is, nothing has really been
added. It’s the same soggy ride, set to a marginally preferable speed.
Depp duly does what Depp does
in these films – he swaggers, he rolls those kohl-heavy Keith Richards eyes, he
leers at his younger female co-star – but this franchise has always been about
delivering pantomimic nonsense, and lots of it. So it is that Golshifteh
Farahani (who starred in last year’s Paterson) is bald with rank teeth as a
conniving witch; so it is Paul McCartney momentarily shows up as Sparrow’s
scouse uncle. After Becks in King Arthur, it’s not the season’s worst celeb
cameo – rather sweetly, Macca strolls on, tells a joke, and walks off, thumbs
semi-aloft – but this isn’t A Hard Day’s Night so much as A Very Easy
Paycheque.
Viewer value-for-money proves
more debatable. The Pirates series hasn’t delivered a memorable set piece since
Dead Man’s Chest’s oversized waterwheel, and time and again this plumps for
distraction over consequence, flooding the screen with images that attain scale
– like the ship that rears up on its haunches in readiness for attack – but not
much meaning. The much-trailed zombie shark sequence comes to feel like
watching somebody playing a tie-in video game.
Maybe the franchise’s success
lies in the bountiful downtime it offers beleaguered consumers: even with the
wind in its sails here, long stretches of fruitless exposition invite one to
have a pee, text a friend, make funeral arrangements, whatever. The rock’n’roll
irreverence Pirates once claimed to have freighted into multiplexes has now
long since drifted over the horizon.
Read full review at Guardian
Movie Rating ★★★☆☆
Johnny Depp's shtick keeps the franchise afloat
Robbie Collin
“This may seem a peculiar
request, but could someone explain why I’m here?” says Johnny Depp, in
character as Captain Jack Sparrow, as soon as he appears in the latest Pirates
of the Caribbean film.
It’s a reasonable question, and
one the film is wise to preempt. Because the necessity of a fifth instalment in
this already long-winded franchise – particularly six years after the weak
fourth, On Stranger Tides, failed to make an impression – is not exactly
shiningly apparent.
Soon enough, though, the point
of Pirates of the Caribbean: Salazar’s Revenge begins to crystalise. The film’s
directors, Joaquin Rønning and Espen Sandberg, are adherents of the J.J. Abrams
school of ancestor worship – and having come of age in the 1980s golden days of
Spielberg, Lucas and Zemeckis, they’ve been tasked with recreating them by a
studio (in this case, Disney) with its own rose-tinted hankering for a time
when the franchise in question hadn’t yet been run into the mud.
The test for Rønning and Sandberg
– a Norwegian duo whose previous film, the 2012 seafaring adventure Kon-Tiki,
was nominated for a foreign-language Oscar – is that the original Pirates film,
The Curse of the Black Pearl, came out in 2003, so the short-circuit shock of
nostalgia could have never been as potent here as it was in, say, Jurassic
World, let alone Star Wars: The Force Awakens.
There’s no question they’ve
recaptured, or at least synthesised, some of the essence of the original Gore
Verbinski film. But the gonzo-Wagnerian backstory the franchise subsequently
built up hasn’t been sufficiently pruned – and with so many characters to
juggle, the story feels less like a coherent chain of events than a bundle of
obligatory subplots.
And action sequences, of
course, two of which really click. In an early bank heist, Sparrow and his
cronies make off with the bank itself, while a terrific mid-film escape from a
public execution unfolds in a kind of whirring, clockwork frenzy, and takes in
some ingenious business with a spinning guillotine and the unimprovable, Laurel
and Hardy-calibre line: “I’m not one to complain normally, but this basket is
full of heads.”
Depp’s shtick is fresher than
you might expect, particularly during these bits, the surprisingly un-dreadful
Paul McCartney cameo, and some spiky, double-entendre-laced back-and-forths.
It’s a pity that some later set-pieces, including the messy and overlong
climax, just look like mirages of pixels. Swashbuckling is so much more fun
when something’s actually there to buckle the swash to.
Knowing what’s going on also
helps. The film’s prologue assumes, optimistically, that cinema-goers will
immediately recall the importance of an underwater ship called The Flying
Dutchman, and why Orlando Bloom might be stranded on it with a bad dose of
barnacle acne.
With Jack Sparrow repositioned
as a tipsy mentor, Carina becomes the film’s de facto heroine: she can argue
her rivals into knots, while her astronomical knowhow leads to her being
mistaken for a witch. If Jeff Nathanson’s script plays the ‘But she’s a girl!’
card a few too many times, it also doesn’t sell her short when things come to
the crunch.
The further adventures of these
two would be a tantalising prospect were this the first film in a franchise
rather than the fifth one. But a post-credits teaser to set up Pirates VI
heralds the return of another face from the past. A mostly fun partial reset,
but this series needs to slip its moorings and make for new horizons.
Read full review at Telegraph
Not Very Well, Anyway
A. O. SCOTT
“Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead
Men Tell No Tales” — is, by contrasts, long and punishing. Its pleasures are so
meager, its delight in its own inventions so forced and false, that it becomes
almost the perfect opposite of entertainment. To insist otherwise is a
variation on the sunk cost fallacy. Since you exchanged money for fun, fun is
surely what you must have purchased, and you may cling to that idea in the face
of contrary evidence. But trust me on this: This movie would be a rip-off even
if someone paid you to see it.
Because, to be honest, it’s
barely a movie at all. The first installments of the “Pirates” franchise conquered
skepticism with exuberance and charm. Somehow, a theme-park ride combined with
clever, madcap visuals and Johnny Depp’s scapegrace showboating added up to
something fresh. But that spirit is long gone. Mr. Depp, as Capt. Jack Sparrow,
goes through the motions like a washed-up rock star reprising his greatest hits
in a half-empty auditorium. The images are so dark and muddy that you can’t see
what’s going on well enough to know why you don’t care. The plot twists, Easter
eggs and surprises are either obvious or labored. You can’t spoil something
that’s already thoroughly rotten.
Now and then you get a reminder
of why you might have enjoyed the earlier movies.
Two appealing young people
(Kaya Scodelario and Brenton Thwaites) meet on a quest for a mysterious and
powerful object. They are joined by Sparrow and pursued by old and new enemies:
the British Navy; the greedy pirate Hector Barbossa (Geoffrey Rush); and an
army of ghouls led by the spectral Captain Salazar (Javier Bardem), known as
the butcher of the sea.
This goes on for more than two
hours. You are invited to sit through every last name on the lengthy end
credits for a teasing extra scene of a couple asleep on linen sheets, a
reminder of how you might have better spent the time. It would be a spoiler to
identify those bedfellows, but the bigger spoiler is that apparently another
sequel is on the way.
Read full review at New York times
Movie Rating ★★☆☆
Long, loud and overstimulating
Michael O'Sullivan
It’s great to have a job
watching — and then writing about — movies. But why does “Pirates of the
Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales” have to feel so much like work?
To be sure, it’s always been
something of an effort to keep track of who’s alive or dead or undead in this
multi-sequel epic featuring walking pirate ghosts and characters who get killed
off in one installment, only to be magically resurrected in the next —
especially after what feels like eight long movies.
What do you mean, this is only
the fifth one? At over 12 hours total running time, the “Pirates” saga is
starting to make the storytelling in “The Lord of the Rings” feel fleet by
comparison. And a post-credits stinger scene tacked onto the new film hints
that “Dead Men Tell No Tales” may not be the “final adventure” after all, as
trailers once promised.
Johnny Depp, right, reprises
his role as Jack Sparrow and Brenton Thwaites, left, plays a son trying to save
his shipwrecked father in the fifth installment of the “Pirates of the
Caribbean” franchise. (Peter Mountain/Walt Disney Studios)
There are naval chase scenes
and booming cannons, and more visual effects than you can shake a cutlass at,
including one scene that resembles the parting of the Red Sea in “The Ten
Commandments.” Another sequence, featuring Jack stuck in a guillotine that is
twirling around and around, like a lethal fidget spinner, is particularly fun,
if also characteristic of the amusement-park aesthetic of the film, which seems
capable of inducing excitement, exhaustion and nausea, in that order.
Yes, “Pirates of the Caribbean:
Dead Men Tell No Tales” remains true to its Disney theme park roots. Loud,
overstimulating and hard to take in all in one sitting, it feels like the
vacation that you’ll need a vacation from.
Read full review at Washington Post
No comments:
Post a Comment