Kong: Skull Island (2017)
IMBD Rating 8.4/10
A team of explorers and soldiers travel to an uncharted
island in the Pacific, unaware that they are crossing into the domain of
monsters, including the mythic Kong.
Director: Jordan Vogt-Roberts
Writers: Dan Gilroy (screenplay), Max Borenstein
(screenplay) | 2 more credits »
Stars: Tom Hiddleston, Samuel L. Jackson, Brie Larson
PG-13 | 2h | Action, Adventure, Fantasy
IMDB link Here
Mix King Kong with The Lost
World, spike it with a bracing dash of Apocalypse Now and you've got Kong:
Skull Island, in which Warner Bros. finally gets the effects-driven fantasy
adventure formula right again after numerous misfires. This highly entertaining
return of one of the cinema's most enduring giant beasts moves like crazy — the
film feels more like 90 minutes than two hours — and achieves an ideal balance
between wild action, throwaway humor, genre refreshment and, perhaps most
impressively, a nonchalant awareness of its own modest importance in the bigger
scheme of things; unlike most modern franchise blockbusters, it doesn't try to
pummel you into submission.
Leagues better than Peter
Jackson's bloated, three-hour Kong of 2005, this one looks poised for strong
returns and potential sequels co-starring hinted-at monsters from movie lore.
Smartly operating under the theory that exposition in
this sort of thing should quickly be dispatched in order to get to the good
stuff, the director, screenwriters Dan Gilroy, Max Borenstein and Derek
Connolly and story creator John Gatins have made Skull Island and its environs
into a storm-enshrouded location in the Pacific Ocean that has never been
charted or found. As the war ends, old-time secret op Bill Randa (John Goodman)
convinces the Nixon Administration to back a small expedition to try to find
and map the place “where God didn't finish the creation, a place where myth and
science meet,” as Randa alluringly puts it. Goodman gets several of the
writers' best lines, including one designed to reference Vietnam but that will
register with modern viewers: “Mark my word, there'll never be a more screwed
up time in Washington.”
In the end, though, it's not
the characters the audiences will have come to see, but the monsters, and the
film doesn't stint in supplying them. This Kong, who makes his entrance a well-timed
half hour in, is far bigger than any before him, about 100 feet tall. Still, he
faces fierce competition on the island from, among others, some toothsome
lizards who happily take advantage of the change in diet offered by the new
human visitors.
There is considerable emotional
investment to be made in Reilly's character, who is no doubt not named Marlow
for nothing. Despite his decades of deprivation, he's the best-adjusted
character on hand, his relaxed acceptance of his odd destiny becoming palpably
moving at times, a reaction never sought or expected in this sort of film. At
least as far as the humans are concerned, Reilly steals the film.
All the requisite elements are
served up here in ideal proportion, and the time just flies by, which can
rarely be said for films of this nature, which, in a trend arguably started by
Peter Jackson, have for years now tended to be heavy, lumbering and overlong. A
post-end credits bit suggests that Warner Bros. already has some famous
opponents lined up for Kong's heavyweight belt, beginning perhaps with Rodan.
Whoever undertakes any follow-ups will have a high bar to clear.
Read full review at Hollywood reporter
An audaciously loopy creature feature
If
war makes monsters of us all, Kong: Skull Island is a creature feature twice
over. It’s 1973, in the twilight days of the Vietnam War. The United States has
all but conceded defeat in the ceasefire and the government in disarray. The
White House is encircled by protestors, and the Watergate scandal hasn’t even
hit its stride.
Kong:
Skull Island is the seventh official remake of or sequel to the original King
Kong film released in 1933, but the first that could have been pitched as a
loopy, audacious B-movie riff on Apocalypse Now. It’s evidently been made on
the understanding that merely unveiling an enormous primate isn’t much cause
for excitement in itself – even if the new breed is four times taller than the
Empire State-climbing original.
A
large part of the enjoyment comes down to the sheer earth-shaking lunacy of
Kong’s daily grind, even before the human intruders are factored in. Without
giving away any specifics of the prizefights in store, let’s just say he’s just
one member of a lively ecosystem.
The
carnage is flamboyant past the point of cartoonishness, but it’s also
frequently outrageous in a way you’re never quite steeled for: for a sense of
the tone, imagine Steven Spielberg’s The Lost World if it had been written and
directed by Gremlins-era Joe Dante. (The Hawaiian backdrops – and a certain
Jackson line of dialogue – are Jurassic Park through and through.)
Skull
Island’s actual director, working from a pithy screenplay by Dan Gilroy and Max
Borenstein, is Jordan Vogt-Roberts, whose earlier coming-of-age comedy The
Kings of Summer had the same heightened, bone-dry sense of humour. As with
Gareth Edwards, whose 2014 reboot of Godzilla is slyly nodded towards here in
anticipation of a coming team-up, this is only Vogt-Roberts’ second film – but
it’s characterful and accomplished with a personal streak.
No members of the ensemble cast could be
described as indispensable, but that’s because many of them are specifically
there to be dispensed with. (Even Hiddleston, who gets star billing, could be
easily chopped out of the plot without derailing it.)
Larson’s
character, who’s far closer to Lara Croft than a Fay Wray scream queen, is
probably as close as any come to non-negotiable, and her leather-holstered 35mm
camera is often pointedly contrasted with the firearms toted by other team
members.
Along
with the film’s vinyl turntables and slide carousels, it’s Exhibit A in Skull
Island’s fetishy soft spot for analogue technology – which is also reflected in
the film’s flat-out ravishing look, which mixes deep, swoony Ektachrome colours
with electrifying up-to-the-moment action staging. In truth, the whole film is
a kind of eccentric retro-artefact with fun at the forefront of its mind: less
Heart of Darkness than darkness with heart.
Read full review at The telegraph
King Kong Kicks Butt In This Gorgeous Pulp Adventure
The film, budgeted at around
$185 million
While the film is technically a
prequel to the Gareth Edwards’ Godzilla, it stands entirely on its own in terms
of content and visual style. The 2014 monster mash was a grim and foreboding
affair, shrouded in darkness and mystery while offering the barest hint of
humanity amid its jaw-dropping visuals. Skull Island goes almost the opposite
route, plunging us immediately into the world of its quirky human characters
and wasting little time giving us what we came to see and delivering most of
its thrills in broad daylight.
Shot by Larry Fong, the guy who
almost had me giving Batman v Superman a positive review, this is an utterly
beautiful motion picture. The naturalistic visuals, imbued with a particular
hot orange vividness, gives the film an absolute authenticity of time and place
and at least the appearance of realism even when we are clearly watching
special effects. I saw this in glorious 2D, but I imagine it’s worth the IMAX
3D upgrade as the broad daylight action will probably survive any 3D
glasses-related dimness.
And the title creature is a
marvel, standing 100 feet tall and exuding animalistic menace no matter which
side he’s fighting on at any given moment. His major introductory beat is a
superb action sequence, even if it’s structured more for action-adventure
thrills than horror or intensity. The film manages to humanize its main monster
without being overly patronizing. This Kong is a protector of Skull Island. But
if you get into his turf, he will bat you out of the sky without thinking
twice.
The picture loses some of its
character focus in the second act as certain characters split off from other
characters, which leaves some of the more interesting folks out of sight and
out of mind for a while. But the finale comes together in an exciting and
satisfying fashion, delivering a climax that pays off the film’s Apocalypse Now
and Moby Dick themes while providing the required monster mash action. And
while there is less of a sense of awe to be found than Peter Jackson’s more
overtly romantic take on this story, there are any number of gorgeous moments
of vivid cinematic beauty and iconic imagery.
Kong: Skull Island is an action
spectacular that offers large-scale monster mayhem, moments of cinematic poetry
(like the grand moments of Kong standing tall amid the sun-drenched carnage)
and memorable character work by a cast of overqualified thespians giving it
their all. Skull Island is the very definition of a complete package. While the
movie exists due to its IP and hopes for a larger cinematic universe, it
justifies itself as high-quality popcorn entertainment and works as a piece of
pop art unto itself.
While I admit will admit that
the overall effect is less wondrous than the Naomi Watts/Adrien Brody/Jack
Black fantasy, that’s also because movies like King Kong are a lot more
commonplace than they were in 2005. Whether you prefer Peter Jackson’s epic
romantic adventure or Jordan Vogt-Roberts’ lean and mean war story, they exist
side by side along with the 1976 remake as artistically valid interpretations
of the 1933 classic. Kong: Skull Island is a confident, pulpy,
character-focused, big-scale adventure story that just happens to be a backdoor
pilot for an expanded universe. That’s how it’s supposed to work.
P.S. Yes, there is a
post-credits sequence, but it is terrible. It feels like it was shot during a
lunch break and is not required viewing to understand Godzilla: King of the
Monsters or the untitled Kong versus Godzilla movies. If you have to leave when
the film ends, don’t feel too badly about it.
Read full review at Forbes
Movie Rating ★★☆☆☆
The Vietnam movie no one needed to see
John C. Reilly boasts a fairly
specific cult following thanks to his character Dr. Steve Brule, the
pseudo-life coach who occasionally appeared on Adult Swim’s Tim and Eric
Awesome Show, Great Job! to yell things like, “Go to bed early, you doofus.
‘Cause when you’re sleeping, there’s no lonely times, it’s just dreams.”
John C. Reilly also,
confusingly, seems to be playing Dr. Steve Brule in Kong: Skull Island. Sure,
here he goes by the name Hank Marlow, but he’s the same awkward,
inappropriately loud fake-sage who slurs like he’s taken a little too much of
an advantage of the hotel’s 2-4-1 piƱa colada deal. In Skull Island, for
example, his preferred angle is wielding a katana and attempting to compliment
women by declaring them, “more beautiful than a hotdog”.
Director Jordan Vogt-Roberts
attempts to make every ‘Nam movie trick shot in the book: the hazy light of the
setting sun breaking through the jungle canopy, highlighting helicopters and
mud-smeared faces as Creedence Clearwater Revival’s ‘Bad Moon Rising’ plays.
It’s as unsubtle a thematic tribute as you can get, at least, until the film –
not once, but multiple times – features intercutting shots of Packard and Kong
making death stares at each other while surrounded by napalm explosions,
playing out like a Tarantino parody.
However, the real issue with
Vogt-Roberts’ tonal clash is that it loses complete sight of what the central
appeal of a King Kong movie was in the first place. Crank it through whatever
stylistic blender you like, but at the end of the day it should still feel like
a monster movie. Mainly, because it is a monster movie.
Skull Island is the second
entry into the universe established by Gareth Edwards’ 2014 Godzilla; direct
references superficially connect the two, but tonally they’re worlds apart.
What Godzilla may have lacked in character development – which is arguably only
marginally improved upon here – Edwards made up for in bounds through
atmospheric direction.
It’s a film that, somehow,
takes the fun out of watching a giant monkey slam-dunk a helicopter into the
ground. Now, could we get the Steve Brule ‘Nam movie, Apocalypse Now, Dummy?
instead?
Read full review at Independent
Movie Rating ★☆☆☆☆
Only de-evolution can explain this zestless mashup
This fantastically muddled and
exasperatingly dull quasi-update of the King Kong story looks like a zestless
mashup of Jurassic Park, Apocalypse Now and a few exotic visual borrowings from
Miss Saigon. It gets nowhere near the elemental power of the original King Kong
or indeed Peter Jackson’s game remake; it’s something Ed Wood Jr might have
made with a trillion dollars to do what he liked with but minus the fun. The
film gives away the ape’s physical appearance far too early, thus blowing the
suspense, the narrative focus is all over the place and the talented Tom
Hiddleston is frankly off his game. Given no support in terms of script and
direction, he looks stiff and unrelaxed and delivers lines with an edge of
panic, like Michael Caine in The Swarm.
This is a Kong deprived of his
kingship and his mystery, and even the title is a jumble, unsure of whether
it’s the ape that’s the star or maybe the island itself, seething with loads of
huge animals, scaring the borrower-sized humans who have rashly dared enter
this domain. It comes to us from director Jordan Vogt-Roberts – known for his
comedy before this – and screenwriters Dan Gilroy, Max Borenstein, Derek
Connolly and John Gatins. The script here feels like the umpteenth rewrite with
almost all the humour and nuance chucked out to make sure it plays in
non-English-language territories.
The dramatic presence of Kong
himself is muddled. The film tries to make him the island’s noble-savage deity,
the hairy good guy, as opposed to the huge baddie lizards who are scuttling
around the place but are kept in check by the mighty Kong. The script makes a
half-hearted joke about not knowing what to call these lizards; I suspect none
of the writers could agree. How did we get from the 1933 King Kong to this? A
theory of de-evolution is needed.
Read full review at Guardian
No comments:
Post a Comment